This is the August 2012 cover of Essence magazine.
Before I say anything let me say this, Nia Long looks absolutely breathtakingly beautiful and her sons are handsome (the older boy) and adorable (the baby).
Nia’s oldest son is 10 years old and her baby boy, named Kez Sunday Udoka and fathered by basketball player Ime Udoka, is barely 9 months old, having been born in November of 2011.
As you can see on the cover, the feature of Nia Long describes her as “Single, Satisfied & Raising Her Boys.” Less than 9 months after the birth of her youngest son Nia Long is already single and satisfied. Considering that marriage was never publicly announced as being in the cards for Nia and Ime, and seeing as how Nia has made it crystal clear that her main concern was having another child before the clock ran out rather than finding a lifelong partner, it shouldn’t be considered too much of a stretch to think that motherhood was more important that marriage-hood to Nia. And, for the record, Nia and every other woman has a right to consider achieving motherhood to be more important than getting married. Therefore, please understand that I am not bashing Nia’s right to have a child under any circumstances she chooses, with whomever she chooses.
I am however questioning why Essence magazine would put Nia and her two children on the cover with the line “Single, Satisfied & Raising Her Boys.” Now that it has become public knowledge that 80 percent of first-born children of black women are born out-of-wedlock and the leading literary publications marketed to black women put never-married, “single and satisfied” black female celebrities on the cover with their children who were born barely 9 months ago, isn’t it time to just accept the obvious–that Essence magazine, like most of black America, finds single motherhood to be acceptable and non-problematic?
I was so close to beginning to read Essence again. So close. So close.







I think this sets a poor example for African-American female teenagers. Nia makes being a single mother look exciting and glamourous. Of course, she has plenty of money, a remunerative profession, an army of handlers, and a staff of maids, and 41 years of age to handle the situation. In comparison, a 16-year-old girl in Newark has very little money, no profession, no handlers, no maturity, and fewer life skills to handle the situation.
Kids are not fashion accessories. I'm sure everyone here, reading this, knows how dramatically your life changes when you have a child. And that child changes you as much as he or she changes. No matter how old and married you are.
I had a Communications Director who took over my shop, freshly married, who gave us lectures about how the glorious job came first, that we should be prepared to ditch our spouses, partners, and romantic others, to devote all our energies to the all-important job. She got very imperious about it. I quailed.
Then she got pregnant.
When she returned from maternity leave, she dropped her imperious tone, and said quietly that our families and kids had to come first, they were more important than the job. It was amazing how changing nappies and 4 a.m. feedings had changed her world view. And she was 30 years old and a law school grad, with a husband and highly supportive family.
I like Essence, it's a good magazine, but it tends to gush over celebrities a little, which is unsurprising.
Kids may not listen to their elders, but they don't hesitate to imitate them.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like