Ebony.com Makes Formal Statement on Genarlow Wilson “Notorious to Glorious” Debacle

Ebony.com Makes Formal Statement on Genarlow Wilson “Notorious to Glorious” Debacle

The good news? Ebony.com has been quick to respond to concerns.
The bad news? That they crafted the story in the way that they did in the first place.

Author : Christelyn Karazin

Author's Website | Articles from

 For background:

Ebony Magazine Editors Don’t “Condone Rape” — Except When They Do! (Ebony Editors’ Idiotic Statement on Genarlow Wilson)

At Ebony Magazine All the Blacks are Still Men

My two shillings: It’s not surprising to me that a black interest publication negate the victimization of black girls and women. This is reinforced again and again through socialization. Black girls are expendable, they’re ‘fast,’ asking to be sexually exploited. To be fair however, I do respect that the publication worked quickly to address the concerns of the readers. I was on Twitter and saw a few exchanges, and the good news is, they seem to be getting the message. It remains to be seen if they will be more conscientious to black women’s interests in the future.

Take a read and let me know what you think.

Regarding our Genarlow Wilson interview…

Less than 48 hours after our interview with Genarlow Wilson went live, it is clear to us that this story and subject remain highly controversial.

For those unfamiliar, in 2003, Wilson was a 17-year-old high school senior convicted on child molestation charges for receiving oral sex from a 15-year-old female classmate. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison by the state of Georgia. After serving nearly three years, he was released early due to what that state admitted had been “cruel and unusual punishment.”

We have read every email, tweet and note regarding your concerns. We understand that many of you were seriously angered by three main things: our implicit support of Wilson; the story’s title, “Notorious to Glorious: Genarlow Wilson is Not a Child Molester and Never Was”; and a perceived lack of compassion towards the two young women who were involved in the case.

Regarding the title, we sincerely apologize for what was clearly viewed as insensitivity by EBONY.com about issues related to sex crimes against women and girls. We are not insensitive and it was not our intention to appear flippant about a most serious matter. Since the relaunch of EBONY.com six months ago, we have been diligent and steadfast in the promotion of information and healthy dialogue around subjects related to the emotional, physical and psychological wellbeing of Black women. In the very first week of launch we ran a story brazenly titled “Stop Telling Women How Not to Get Raped.”  In the weeks and months after that, we continue on that path.

At EBONY.com, in particular, we are largely a female editorial team and we take pride in our consistently progressive stance on women’s issues. To suggest otherwise, simply means that you are not familiar with this website. To any who would charge EBONY.com with being “apologists” for Black men, you are wrong. We strongly doubt that you would find agreement among any of the brothers who have been taken to task in this space. What we are, and what the EBONY brand has always been, is a home for information, discourse and uplift for Black men AND women.

Many of you took issue with the word “glorious,” others felt that stating that ‘Wilson is not a child molester’ was misleading, as he was convicted on a child molestation charge. It is the spirit of the title that has been lost in translation and what we deeply regret—and apologize for.

Be Sociable! Share!
Pinterest


Related Posts


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Joyce345 1738 pts

The whole debacle is really just disgusting.

 

Why do women keep talking about consent when the victim was drunk and underage? AND when another victim was clearly unconscious. I'm disgusted, really.

 

Frankly, even if the girls had 'consented' what is so 'Glorious' about several guys lining up to abuse a 15 year old? It is still disgusting to me and quite disrespectful of Ebony to feature him.

 

Did I mention the whole thing is disgusting? Sheesh! Any woman who downplays this needs therapy.

SwirlQueen 973 pts

How about interviewing the vicitm and how she has fared in the aftermath Ebony?.  Was she a true victim of her environment?  Why was she carrying on like this at a party in the first place as many times young girls who were molested at a young age become promiscuious?  Has anyone cared to see if anyone reached out to her to provide counseling or intervention?  Ebony stepped in it and showed their true colors (pun very much intended).  They did not change if you ask me.  This apology is not a real apology, it is an acknowledgement of a few facts..  They did not denounce Mr. Wilson or his behavior.  They are so wanting to uplift the black man that they did forget about the majority of people who buy their magazine.  I for one don't know a single man (other than my doctor or dentist) who buys Ebony.  Everyone one I know personally who has this magazine in their homes or offices are black women.  And this is what they get for their loyalty. smh

Joyce345 1738 pts

 SwirlQueen

That is not a real apology. They have not acknowledged any actual wrongdoing on their part. They have not admitted lying by saying that he is not a child molester even though Mr Wilson is a CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTER.

 

I believe in forgiveness, but forgiveness does not include lying and pretending that there was no crime. That is not forgiveness. That is dishonesty.

MissFLondon 655 pts

Clearly ladies, their usual 'victims' du jour, Chris Brown and R Kelly were unavailable, so they felt the need to drag up another mildly questionable black man.

 

I do remember being startled at the harsh sentence that the gentleman was given and then pleased that he was free, but his actions were wrong, and a hero's welcome in a notable black publication is unacceptable.

 

Quite honestly, we really are the authors and commentators of our own failure. Why do we love showing dodgy people, and then throwing our full support behind them??

 

We really keep sending out the message that blacks as a group will accept any idiot.

Patricia Kayden 1673 pts

No matter what Ebony and other BW who support DBR Black men say, Genarlow Wilson is a convicted child molester.  I don't understand why Ebony couldn't find a decent, young Black man to feature.  I am sure there are many of them out there. 

 

Perhaps this backlash will make Ebony think twice before publishing such articles in the future.

Oneof thegirls 214 pts

 Patricia Kayden Haaa and they pulled their article. What losers they are.

VintageNarcissa 3151 pts

Wow, just wow. Any other magazine would have interviewed the victims. The black magazine interviews the perpetrator. Backwards as hell! 

harleyq2 190 pts

There is more to this case that requires reading more sources. My understanding of his situation is his conviction and subsequent fight was for having consenting oral sex with a 15 year old (if she were 16, then all would have been okay) when he was 17 and this resulted in a felony charge which has a mandatory 10 yr sentence  because of the laws regarding anal and oral sex which are seen as very deviant. However, I read that if they had engaged in genital to genital sex, then it would have been a misdemeanor and no child molestation status. He was found not guilty of rape. His legal battle about the sentence has resulted in changes in the law about punishment for consenting minors.  So, legally he was convicted of child molestation; however, it is a stretch to call him a true child molester.  

 

 Now apparently the sexual acts were recorded which involved the two young ladies and other members at the party who were also charged because of sex with the willing 15 year old.  Having not seen the tape myself and a jury finding him not guilty after seeing the tape, it would not be a stretch to speculate that the party was a wild sex parties (which unfortunately some young women freely participate in knowing they will be sexually serving multiple men). I find that aspect of this case much more distasteful and disturning for young women rather than a 15 and 17yr old having sex which is not a big deal. In addition, I do find the character of the boys who particpate in these group "train sex" parties no higher than a bottom feeder.

 

If he really did rape someone at that party, then I would be the first to cheer on a long jail sentence in which he would get a good taste of his own medicine. However, from reading multiple news sources, it does not seem to be the case. The most he seem to be guilty of is being a disgusting low life participating in 'train sex.'

Blackberry 1177 pts

@harleyq2 Hmmmmm I agree and disagree Agree: there is an aspect of this case that has nothing to do with defendant's conduct. That is Statutory Intent --- Georgia is antiquated (and unconstitutional) to the extend that is categorizes one sex act as more deviant than the other. Namely oral and anal sex (though in this case it was the oral sex). This difference is because historically the law deemed these types of sex act as "gay only" and because being gay was crime molesting a child in a "gay manner" was WAY worse than "regular molestation". These distinction are so bogus and antiquated that I need not further explain. Additionally, when the law was crafted (teen train sex parties for popular High school athletes) was not in the statutory conception. Meaning that "gernalow's conduct is NOT the conduct" the statute was originall designed to punish. The law is antiquated and therefore punishments under that law are improper. Sentence reduced NOT overturned. Disagree: Consenting oral sex & willing 15year have been used by yourself (and others) when talking about this case. This is WRONG! Any sex or sex act ith a person under the age of consent triggers the crime of Statuory rape - this is a strict liabily crime. A person below the age of consent is deemed of sufficient diminished capacity so as to be categorically unable to consent --- as rape law requires affirmative consent as a defense --- in statutory rape laws are strict becaue the elements of 1) lack of consent is already met. The second element 2) force and sex need only be proven to have occurred. This guy really did rape someone at a party! Let's not forget that. Just because Georgia back enough to use antiquated laws based on homophobia to convict this guy under a molestation statute has nothing do with whether or not a rape occurred. Had the prosecutor been slightly more modern minded this guy would have gotten a Felony charge but just not as a molester!

MixedUpInVegas 1647 pts

 Blackberry  harleyq2

 Thank you, Blackberry, for speaking up for this underage girl!  The whole idea of statutory rape is to protect young girls from being manipulated and used by shameless men who are old enough to know better.  Is there a man alive who hasn't heard the term "jail bait?"  How can anyone defend this soul-less dirt bag?  And how can anyone downplay his depraved culpability in this matter?  How is it that he is entitled to more protection under the law than a young girl who is still legally a child?  And what is to celebrate about his escaping the consequences of his vile abuse of this young girl?

eugeniaberg 7245 pts moderator

@Blackberry There is more to this story but none of it is going to make him look any better. http://roslynhardyholcomb.com/2012/07/11/at-ebony-magazine-all-the-blacks-are-still-men/ http://maybesomaybeno.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/consent-is-not-negligible/ http://www.whataboutourdaughters.com/waod/2012/7/11/updateebonycoms-editors-renew-their-support-of-genarlow-wils.html These are three of them, as it stands these two girls were drunk, one I believe being semi-conscious. I'm sorry no where in any laws that I've ever seen can drunk or semi-conscious ppl give consent. I couldn't sign a enforceable contract like that less known consent to sex. Once that's known, he's not getting no benefit of the doubt from me, also he wasn't acquitted of anything.

Toni_M 18798 pts moderator

....Of all the people you could interview for your magazine.......

Blackberry 1177 pts

Another thing that pissed me off. I was reading the linked comments and there was something about their "not being forcible rape". Look every state is different, but the "force" in forcible rape (or any kind of rape) is NOT the force, or lack therof, used to subdue one's victim. It is the force used to engage in the sex act itself. This part is really descriptive so scroll past if you don't want to read it. For example: forcible rape: oral sodomy. Here the forcible aspect of the crime occurs at the moment the penis enters the mouth of another. Any other force, like beating punching, shoving etc that is battery. Probably aggravated (depending on the jurisdiction) because it occurred to facilitate the rape. This is important! Because previously force was a separate element in the crime. A stat had to prove "the man" used force to rape a "the woman" if intercourse occurred and the man did not actually batter her then there was no rape! Consent was implied where the Woman lacked marks or bruises, because "good woman" would resist the advances of a man who is not her husband. Outrageous. (never mind how hard it is to prove rape in a marriage) This change in the law was made to require a man to have affirmative consent and to do away with the antiquated crap about "loose women asking for it" from being a proper defense. So way to undermine women's safety Ebony magazine and commenters!

Blackberry 1177 pts

WHAT! I only heard about this whole debacle just now....I also missed hearing about the original conviction so I am playing catch up. I gather either that his sentenced was reduced, but not the conviction OR because the mandatory sentencing requirements attached to his crime were deemed unconstitutional his sentence was overturned? But there is NO doubt as to facts of what occured. He is NOT nor is the state of Georiga claimign he was wrongfuly convictied, correct ?None of the articles linked were particularly clear on what happened as a legal matter. But then that is probably part of the problem. I guess in the state of Georgia sex with someone under the age of consent is criminalizes as child molestation rather than statutory rape? The terms used by legal statutes are not always congruent with a layman's understanding of the same term. I am sure some people (right or wrong - and I think they are wrong) viewed the defendant's actions as problematic, but not the actions of a molester. When people here that word they immediately conjure the imagine of a specific type of sexual predator, with malicious intent to molest children (and I mean very young children). Because the defendant did not mesh with this archetype the logic becomes "he is not a molester therefore he is not as bad a person as a molester therefore his is not guilty". It's not my logic, but I can see how people think that way and then write ridiculous headlines for even more ridiculous an uninformative articles. Ebony is not hard hitting news nor a legal journal, yeah the defendant is black, but that is not enough to properly make him the subject of an Ebony article! Anytime Ebony seeks to publish an article outside of there wheelhouse (i.e. commentary on the after effects of the reduction of sentencing pursuant to sex crime for violations of the 8th amendment incorporated against state through the 14th amendment) they are likely to "step in it". The apologize was not an apology - it was we didn't mean to offend, our intentions were positive so stop complaining. I wonder if that is how the victim felt people treated her after the crime. "your complaint has ruined my life....when I didn't mean to hurt you, I didn't mean what happened like that. Thank god I'm about to graduate from college" Anyway

Patricia Kayden 1673 pts

 Blackberry You're right Blackberry.  His sentence was reduced as "cruel and unusual punishment", but his conviction has never been overturned.