Does A Superior Culture Make the Israeli’s Successful? Mitt Romney Seems to Think So

Does A Superior Culture Make the Israeli’s Successful? Mitt Romney Seems to Think So

Mitt Romney is currently on the tail end of his three-nation overseas trip which was ostensibly designed to convince U.S. voters that he is ready to engage in some heavy-duty political wheeling and dealing if he were to become President of the United States. What Mitt Romney and Co. have actually succeeding in doing is offending millions of people via a series of comments that one writer for the Telegraph has famously described as “utterly devoid of charm and mildly offensive”

Author : Jamila Akil

Author's Website | Articles from

Mitt Romney is currently on the tail end of his three-nation overseas trip which was ostensibly designed to convince U.S. voters that he is ready to engage in some heavy-duty political wheeling and dealing if he were to become President of the United States. What Mitt Romney and Co. have actually succeeding in doing is offending millions of people via a series of comments that one writer for the Telegraph has famously described as “utterly devoid of charm and mildly offensive”–and this was just on the first day of his overseas jaunt, this was supposed to be the easy day. While in Israel, Romney continued down the path of making frenemies of the people he was supposed to be charming by suggesting that the reason for Israel success–as contrasted against the poverty of the Palestinian people–was due to “the power of at least culture and a few other things.”

Romney’s comments were promptly rebuked by a Palestinian official. “It is a racist statement and this man doesn’t realize that the Palestinian economy cannot reach its potential because there is an Israeli occupation. It seems to me this man lacks information, knowledge, vision and understanding of this region and its people. He also lacks knowledge about the Israelis themselves. I have not heard any Israeli official speak about cultural superiority,” said Saeb Erekat, an aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Romney’s aide then responded in characteristic fashion by saying that Romney’s comments had been “grossly mischaracterized.”

When asked to respond to Romney’s comments for an article in Bloomberg Businessweek, MIT economist and co-author of the book Why Nations Fail, Daron Acemoglu had this to say: “Israel is so much richer than other countries in the area because it was founded by people with high human capital bringing in technology from Europe, and has been integrated into the world economy, continuing the process of technology transfer throughout the last several decades. The reason why this better technology and better human capital has not benefited Palestinians next door clearly has to do with institutions and with Israel’s policies (blockades but more importantly its understandable unwillingness to invest in the West Bank and Gaza). So it’s much more institutions, human capital and technology with clear historical roots rather than some sort of Palestinian or Arabic culture holding these places back.”

The parallels between the Israeli/Palestinian situation and the United States/African-American situation become obvious if one looks close enough. The Israeli’s have had far more resources, both in the social capital of their people and the assistance received from the United States, than the Palestinians have had access to; just as the more numerous white American citizens have been the beneficiaries of more financial assistance and accumulated social capital than black Americans. Over time, these resources become cumulative and the effect is that one group ends of being greatly advantaged in a head-to-head match up with the other group.

This is not to say that there are not elements of African-American culture, elements which many black people accept and propagate, that need to be changed. This is to say that culture and subsequent success do not materialize out of thin air; history has happened, money has changed hands, and the situation that Israeli’s and the Palestinians now find themselves in is a result of decades of geopolitical maneuvers. In short: the history of the Palestinian/Israeli situation is complex. And Mitt Romney’s pat answer that the culture of the Israeli’s is somehow superior does not do the situation justice as an adequate explanation for the current state of comparison between Israel and Palestine.

Was Mitt Romney being racist when he alluded to a supposedly superior Israeli culture? I don’t know. But it does appear that Mitt was at the least uninformed and insensitive–two qualities that the Politician-In-Chief of America probably shouldn’t have.

Be Sociable! Share!
Pinterest


Related Posts


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
johnnyjohnny 5 pts

Oh, the Palestinians were offended?Want to know what happens when you get offended? NOTHING. YOU LIVE. LIFE GOES ON.

Maxine 1005 pts

Romney doesn't know what he's talking about.  He heard the media buzz that Obama had problems with American Jewry because of (perceived) lack of support for Israel, and he jumped on that opportunity.  I lived in Israel for three months as an archaeology student, and am wondering which culture he's referring to. They're not as monolithic as we assume.  Jerusalem is dominated by religious conservatives, surprisingly made up of a large number of Americans.  Then there's Tel Aviv, which is pretty secular and has a European beach city feel.  A huge chunk of Israelis are from the former Soviet Union.  Then there's the many Israelis with roots in North African and other Middle Eastern countries.  Of course Romney's ignoring the importance of kibbutzes (collective communities, usually based on farms) in Israel, which is pretty much communism with a small c, the opposite of his extreme capitalism.  Yeah it's pandering and I don't think it will put him over the top in November.  

zipporah 1714 pts

This may be 'off topic' on what the article is about: On Evias site, she has 4 black girls married to white mormon guys. There is a website attached to a tv show whatloveisthis.tv. The lady is a former mormon out of the polygamy branch; she is 5th generation,same as Romney (her dad and grandpa has more than one sisterwife). She had a black pastor on her show Dan Mamatela of millcreek baptist church in UT. He says the Book of Abraham within the Book of Mormon and The Pearl of Great Price are both ANTIBLACK and racist AS DOCTRINE....CHRISTIANS may have been racist but it was taught as being a sin. It's NOT PART OF DOCTRINE. The pastor suggests they tear the Book of Abraham out the Book of Mormon, et.c--- It's possible Mitt has to 'fish or cut bait' when it comes to his religion--(also has polygamy within family)---when it comes to getting a vice president---none are 'WHITE AND DELIGHTSOME'-----I wonder how these BW are; one is as dark as Alek Wek

This comment has been deleted
Brenda55 19294 pts moderator

 Frye You said it yourself.  Your post was unrelated to the topic which is why it is gone.

Frye 5 pts

 Brenda55 Way to go, practising the very same thing you accuse others of doing.Cheers.

Hopefully , despite deleting my comment you'll give the author a heads up!

Brenda55 19294 pts moderator

 Frye 

"Way to go, practising the very same thing you accuse others of doing.Cheers."

 

Whatever that means. 

 

"Hopefully , despite deleting my comment you'll give the author a heads up!"

 

She will get it in her e-mail so message delivered. It just did not need to be posted here.

 

Cheers back.

Joyce345 1738 pts

If were him I would have left out the word 'superior.' It will just get people pissed off unecessarily. There are better ways of saying the same thing.

tsilvaalmeida 8 pts

 Joyce345 he didn't say superior actually. He just said the state of Israel is due to their culture, which is really a common place statement. The "superiority", according to the article writer, comes from the context.

Law Wanxi 5784 pts

Mittens of Romneyshire makes me really miss Herman Cain. Cain didn't make as many gaffes and he was a lot more fun. 

Toni_M 18755 pts moderator

I could have sworn I commented, but I guess it didn't go through. :S

 

I can only face-palm at this point. The debates should be entertaining...

tsilvaalmeida 8 pts

Believing one culture brings superior results than another is not racism. Racism is race-determined prejudice. Cultures are not race-determined, a japanese man, if raised in France, will have French culture.

 

So no, Romney was not being racist and it makes no sense to believe that he was. Was he uninformed and insensitive? I don't know about uninformed, as he probably knows that the Israeli had much more help than the Palestinians, but perhaps he believes the Palestians' culture keeps them from establishing better relations with the developed countries.

 

About him being insensitive, I don't care.

Toni_M 18755 pts moderator

 tsilvaalmeida , just because *you* don't care doesn't mean (1) other potential voters share your belief and (2) the Palestinians who took his comments badly are wrong. The man has been on a foot-in-mouth marathon for ages now, it's hardly surprising people are taking him to task on being out-of-touch or just plain ignorant. 

 

While I'll agree that his behavior wasn't necessarily racist, that doesn't mean it couldn't be construed as problematic. Especially coming from someone aspiring to be the leader of the United States, one of the most ethnically diverse countries on the planet. And as we move forward into an increasingly globalized and ethnically-diversifying world, the leaders will be expected to at least make the effort to empathize with other cultures. The days of hiding behind ethnocentric biases for the "safety" of one's population and supposed preservation of traditions are vanishing.

 

I can understand being anal retentive about the misuse of certain words, but the fundamental point is that if he keeps making himself look unattractive to more and more voters and embarrassing to Americans in general, it will be a question of just how big a landslide Obama will win by.

 

If he's serious, he needs to at least start self-editing and figure out where he can genuinely connect with Americans and non-Americans alike and stop looking like a jackass.

tsilvaalmeida 8 pts

 Toni_M it might not be politically correct, but I don't think most Americans would find a statement that the Israeli's culture is superior to the Palestinians' problematic.

 

second, I wasn't being "anally retentive" about the word racism. Racism is a crime, you shouldn't accuse someone of racism just because he said something you don't think is nice. It's more likely that the author was being to liberal about it.

 

third, about me not caring about him being "sensitive", I'd wager most of the greatest American presidents weren't very sensitive. You can probably find a very politically incorrect phrase or action by each one of them. How sensitive was George Washington about Ona Judge Steines?

Toni_M 18755 pts moderator

 tsilvaalmeida "t might not be politically correct, but I don't think most Americans would find a statement that the Israeli's culture is superior to the Palestinians' problematic"

 

But according to you elsewhere he didn't actually say superior, so it's a moot point, isn't it?

 

I used the word "anal retentive" because, like I said, I understood. Sometimes I get really bugged by words being used incorrectly, including the word racism. I feel that if people use a word wrong repeatedly, it can affect truly appreciating the meaning of that word in various contexts.

 

"I'd wager most of the greatest American presidents weren't very sensitive."

 

I'm not interested in "greatness". I'm not a romantic. You could search high and low for a president who was good but not also flawed in some way.

 

I'm interested in pragmatic and practical. And pragmatically speaking, as I stated, globalization is making it increasingly impossible for the United States to not take into consideration the knowledgeableness of its leaders. I didn't say "great" or "legendary", but empathetic. Understanding the point of view of other countries and ethnic groups is an easier way of building bridges than stereotyping them, discrediting them, and using all sorts of propaganda to dehumanize them. Like I said, the days of ethnocentric biases that guide us to make far-reaching decisions regarding how we deal with the world are vanishing. Globalization is making it harder and harder to not impact or be impacted by what happens in other countries.

 

 

We cannot afford to elect someone who is dangling in a mental, emotional, and financial ivory tower and can't grasp this.  This is of course, just the tip of the iceberg. Romney hasn't made himself attractive on domestic issues either. Overall, he's looking less and less viable for the presidency.

Toni_M 18755 pts moderator

 tsilvaalmeida *dangling from

Pearl Rose 1182 pts

I seen this on the news. Why does he always say stupid things or things that can easily be misconstrued!

 

Patricia Kayden 1673 pts

How are we defining success?  There are plenty of mega-millionaire Arabs.  Has Romney ever heard of Dubai?  Is he saying that Jews have some gene that helps them be successful?

 

I wonder what he would say to Black Americans, who are often on the bottom of the economic ladder (even often behind Latinos).   Should be interesting if he wins.

 

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/06/19/the-rise-of-asian-americans/

zipporah 1714 pts

@Patricia Kayden It's not the 'genes' many orthodox have certain 'habits' that, if they follow, they would be successful...there is a book by a certain orthodox Rabbi Lapin called THOU SHALL PROSPER which is a good read about acquiring wealth etc.Many latinos stress family and have larger ones than blacks,marry with one spouse,(which is key) plus they have quicerareas when the girl turns 15 similar to sweet 16 but more religious towards the church...most done in spanish..lol

Lili2009 1826 pts

If Mitt wants to go there, then he'll have to admit that the UAE has a superior culture to the U.S. because apparently wealth=superiority. I  love this quote from The Telegraph about Mitt being “utterly devoid of charm and mildly offensive." At least he's consistent on that front.