Jamila: “Why I *heart* Sallie Krawcheck and Marissa Mayer”

Jamila: “Why I *heart* Sallie Krawcheck and Marissa Mayer”

When it comes to women, people equate sacrifice with love. Why are we still fighting the antiquated notion that a woman who has little-to-no desire to be a stay-at-home mom must not love her kids?

Author : Jamila Akil

Author's Website | Articles from

I *heart* powerful, accomplished women–women like Marissa Mayer, the 4-month old CEO of tech company Yahoo!, who was hired for her latest position when she was pregnant, gave birth two months ago, and then went back to work two weeks later. I also admire Sallie Krawcheck, a woman who was once known as the most powerful woman in finance, and whose name is currently being bandied about in the media as one of those in the running to becoming the next head of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Yeah, having a family is nice, but I want a high-powered career, money, power, and respect, too. What’s so wrong with that?

Apparently, depending upon whom you ask, there is quite a bit wrong with that. When Marissa Mayer said that she only planned on taking a two-week maternity leave after giving birth and that she planned to work through the entire leave, she was roundly criticized–oddly enough, some of the harshest criticism came from self-proclaimed feminists, who felt that Mayer’s decision was setting back the movement to gain paid, extended maternity leave for women.

Writer, serial entrepreneur, life coach, etc., etc. Penelope Trunk attended a Forbes Executive Women’s Forum in 2007 where she was scheduled to speak. Sallie Krawcheck was also a speaker and answered questions from the audience. At the time, Trunk was a working woman with a stay-at-home husband; she asked Krawcheck the following question (in bold) during a Q&A:

I have a stay-at-home husband and it’s a train wreck. How do you work that out in your house?
I had a stay-at-home husband and he went back to work. My first husband could not get over it and I had to choose another husband. I would come home from a meeting and I’d say sorry I’m late and he’d roll his eyes. As soon as you get the eye roll you have a problem And in fact, he was having an affair. That was a waste of four good years, and I was cute then, too; I should have dated a lot more men than I did. I got a much better husband the second time around because I had had practice making decisions with imperfect information.

Another forum attendee asked Krawcheck:

How do you handle leaving the kids when you travel?
The thing with the kids is to show no fear. If you show fear, they can smell it. Say, “I love you and I can’t wait to see you, but I love my work.” I cry when I close the door. I went to China for two weeks. The kids were okay; I bribed them. I waited to tell my daughter until I took her to the American Idol concert.

In the comments section on Penelope’s blog, comment after comment lambastes Krawcheck as being selfish, uncaring, and a bad mother for seemingly choosing career over being a wife and mother. Except, Krawcheck appears to be a great wife and mother–her current husband hasn’t issued any public complaints. And odds are that her children are exceptionally well-taken care. However, to some people the only way that children can be well-taken care of is if the biological mother is the one doing the taking care. The complainers say that a woman who serves her family food that a chef cooks can’t care too much about her family–unless she actually puts her hand in the pot, she must not love her family.

When it comes to women, people equate sacrifice with love. Why are we still fighting the antiquated notion that a woman who has little-to-no desire to be a stay-at-home mom must not love her kids? If I had a huge house I would want it to be kept clean–I just don’t want to be the one to clean it. If I had a husband I would want him to have freshly pressed suits from the cleaners–I just don’t want to be the one to have to go to the cleaners. And of course I want my family to have freshly made, nutritious meals–but, since I don’t enjoy cooking on a regular basis, what’s wrong with paying someone else to cook those meals?

There is nothing wrong with desiring to make home and family the center of your universe. On the other hand, there are women for whom a husband and kids are just two pieces of the puzzle that fit together in order to construct a picture of a happy life. Sallie Krawcheck and Marissa Mayer are two of those women. I’m one of those women. And I just wanted to take a moment to say that women like us–Sallie, Marissa, and I–love our family just as much as women who forsake high-powered careers.
________________________________________________
Jamila is a Senior Editor at Beyond Black and White. She is also a full-time student in an MBA program. Follow her on Twitter @jamilaakil

Be Sociable! Share!
Pinterest


Related Posts


Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
dani-BBW 1784 pts

I think it's possible to be ambitious and be a stay at home mom, it's just that the subject of your ambition changes. To me, ambition is the tenacity to pursue and achieve a particular goal. So being a SAHM, you may no longer have career goals, you may instead have goals pertaining to family, home and perhaps hobbies. Maybe you realize you have a child who has an aptitude for languages and so you decide he or she could pick up French. Maybe you have a child who has speech difficulty and so you set a goal to follow the dr.'s orders to get he or she up to speed by doing so many exercises every day for the next 6 months or something. Maybe you decide the equipment at your local playground is shoddy and you embark on a personal drive to better it, by enlisting other neighbors and your local city councilman to replace it.

 

If I have kids, I'd like to be a SAHM until they are in school because while I love my job and have a great career, I can't imagine enjoying it so much that I would rather stay there than be at home, if finances are not an issue. My mother stayed at home with us until we went to school and I have so many memories of spending lots of time with her when I was very little. I also feel that it really prepared us for school because she had the ability to be so attentive since she was around.

 

However, I am also not necessarily in a career right now that I love, i just happen to be very good at it and it's great money. I'm not out setting the world on fire to be a better place in something that I feel passionate about, so right now, it isn't that much a choice to me. If one day I am in that kind of career, I think the choice would be a lot harder, deciding the balance between something I really, really enjoy and fulfills me, and giving the best life possible to a new little life that is so dependent upon me. Maybe I'd compromise and work 3 days a week or something.

kiki100 630 pts

I support  Krawchek who has a husband who is a stay at home dad, I am with her or the simple reason that her child will be with its parent. i would not agree with going back to work and having no one but a baby sitter to care for her child.

Veron 1400 pts

This is an issue of perspective, and it simply comes down to people being able to understand that not all women have the same priorities, needs, and ambitions.  Working mothers and SAH mothers are both capable of raising functional, well-rounded children.  They are also both capable of raising *ssholes. And the judgement of who does which more often is subjective and irrelevant.

 

What is objective and incredibly significant is that time and time again it has been proven that happy, resilient parents raise happy resilient children, who go on to be happy resilient adults who in turn raise happy resilient children.  Everyone's definition of happy in is different, and everyone coping skills reach variant thresholds.  What one person can tolerate, another person can't.  Some women couldn't possibly be happy having to leave home and family to work, and may pass that unhappiness to their children.  Those women and their children are better off if they stayed at home.  Some women would be emotionally crippled if they were forced to center her entire life on her home when she would prefer to build herself and her interests in the world outside of it.  That woman and her children are better off if she worked. 

 

The aim should be to do what makes you happy, what allows you to be your best self, so that you can pass on your best to your offspring.  If that means working, or being at home, it is what it is.  Just know that what works for you does not for a good number of others, and they and their children probably won't suffer for it as much as you think they will... if at all.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

Another note on ambition:

 

I don't think being ambitious is necessary to being a good person/mom/husband/parent, etc. Ambition is like introversion--you can be a great person and be an extrovert; you can be a great person and be an introvert. Ambition is just a personality trait that some people have in greater abundance than others. 

 

You have to be "nice" in order to be good person; no one can be a good person without also being a nice person. But you don't have to be ambitious in order to be good. 

 

So, I think that more women should just acknowledge that they aren't ambitious rather to pretend that making a lovely home and raising children is an ambitious task. 

 

I hope that makes sense.

 

tracyreneejones 3548 pts

 Jamila I agree with this. Its all the difference between female admins and executives. One just wants to fill in the hours so that they can go home and the other is at home. 

The Working Home Keeper 6592 pts

 tracyreneejones  Jamila I will fully admit that I'm in the "just filling hours" category LOL!  Once I became pregnant with our first, I took myself off the fast track my boss had laid out before me, in favor of a administrative position with more flexibility, less stress and less hours.  I don't regret that decision at all. 

 
tracyreneejones 3548 pts

 The Working Home Keeper  Jamila And that's cool, I just began to realize not every woman wants to 'rule the world' though stay at home Mom wasn't an option for my first. It would be for future children. I came, I saw, I conquered....now I'm over it. I would be a stay at home/work from home Mom if I had to parent again. (note use of the word..had too parent...) 

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

On different types of love:

 

I was reminded of a conversation that I had with my girlfriend about the different types of Greek love. 

 

Agape: 

 

Eros, or passionate love, if what you have for your spouse/significant other. 

 

Agape, is a general affection, it's the way you love humanity in general or a favorite activity. 

 

Philia, which is a love born of familiarity--you "love" your best friend. 

 

and 

 

Storge, which is the way you love a child. It is a love born almost from obligation--you love your child because you gave birth to him or her; the nature of the relationship demands that you love them. 

The Working Home Keeper 6592 pts

For me, there's nothing in the working world that can compare with being a wife and mother.  And I say that as a woman who works outside of the home.  Absolutely nothing.  The work I do inside of my home, loving and nurturing my family is life changing, it's world changing.  I'm shaping three individuals who will go out and impact the world someday.  For me, there's nothing greater than that.  I am a working mom, but I'm not a feminist or a careerist.  Husband, children and home are still my highest priority.

Neecy 1941 pts

"The kids were okay; I bribed them. "

 

Sorry but something about that line just bugs me. Maybe its the word BRIBE. Ugh...

Neecy 1941 pts

Meh. I don't see the big deal about working moms and this obsession with revering them as some great idols of womanhood. Its a choice they made. That is all. No big deal.  If I have kids I'l certainly be a working mom of some sort but surely I would't think I was some great superwoman b/c of it. 

 

I admire stay at home mothers as equally as any woman who has a high demanding career and kids.

 

Being a full time stay at home mother IS A JOB. People seem to forget this - especially women eager to constantly compare how "men can do this and that, and women should be able to do it to". Children need REARING. They need to be DEVELOPED. Its no easy task raising kids. Its not about the fact of having means and money to provide for them. Children need REARING, ATTENTION and TIME. If both parents are out working most of the time because they have demanding careers, IMO the children are missing out on some personal rearing from that parent. The only difference is a stay at home mother is giving more personal hands on attention to her children than a woking mom would be able to give simply just b/c the working mom is WORKING outside of the home and has to balance two things instead of one (a career and family).

 

Women who stay home and raise kids are JUST as ambitious and deal with high stress and such and shoud NEVER be made to feel as if they aren't "achieving" as much as a woman in Mayers position.

 

Me personally, if I could make the choice i would want nothing more to have more hands on time raising my children and focusing on a hobby as  secondary. And there are a lot of women who feel the same and who are AMBITIOUS as well.

 

People also have children for selfish reasons on both ends. people who just have kids for the sake of having them even though they don't want them. A lot of women do this to the detriment of their children.

 

 

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Neecy "Women who stay home and raise kids are JUST as ambitious and deal with high stress..."

 

 I have to disagree. Raising her own kids doesn't make a woman ambitious. 

Neecy 1941 pts

Raising kids is NOT an easy task. Ask any hands on parent who actually deals with them and raises them and develops them. Yes you need to be ambitious to be a stay at home mother and raise, develop and give your kids the amunition to be and to grow up as productive individuals in society.

 

When you are out working 10-12 hours a day in a job, you are not providing AS MUCH AS YOU COULD of  that for your kids because you are balancing a career AND kids. So just b/c you acquired a skill and have chosen to sacrifice a more hands on approach to raising your children doesn't make you any more ambitious or a superwoman (in my eyes) than a woman that has DECIDED she'd prefer to throw more of her skill and ambition into raising her children an giving them a more hands on rearing.

 

 

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Neecy "Raising kids is NOT an easy task."

 

I didn't say it was easy, but it's not as if one has to apply for a special license in order to be a parent. Anyone is allowed to do it; and people only stop you from doing it (i.e., taking your kids) if you do something terribly egregious. To me, comparing rearing of your own kids with doing Marissa Mayer's job is the equivalent of thinking that graduating from Big State U that accepts everyone who applies is the equivalent of graduating from Harvard. When it comes to degree of selectivity, there really is no comparison. 

 

Yes, childrearing is hard, but it is definitely not selective and does not qualify one as ambitious. 

Neecy 1941 pts

 Jamila Ok I see where you are coming from. I still disagree. and I guess I just don't see the big deal with the Melissa Mayers of the world being revered for chosing a career and motherhood. *shrugs*

 

Now if we want to revere them for their skills in their jobs thats another thing. 

 

It seems some women do enjoy more recognition for making it in demanding careers but also want to get revered for being mothers too. i don;t see why or what makes them any more special. The fact is one of those things (the career or the kids) is going to have to take a back seat to the other in some ways.

Sunshine789 711 pts

 Neecy "When you are out working 10-12 hours a day in a job, you are not providing AS MUCH AS YOU COULD of  that for your kids because you are balancing a career AND kids."

 

I have to disagree with this statement for two reasons. One, in the case of parents who have no choice to work, bringing home $$$ is as much as they can do. Love does not buy food, shelter and schoolbooks.

 

Secondly, I know a lot of kids (now adults) who were raised by stay-at-home moms, and many of them are behind the curve when it comes to emotional independence and taking care of their basic needs by themselves because they are so used to mommy swooping in any time they have a problem. I don't think that quantity of hours at home = better childcare. A neat as a pin house, pie and holiday decorations does not a better mommy make. 

 

My mom was a working mom who would have preferred to be a stay-at-home mom had she had a choice. But she inadvertently taught me a lot of lessons that served me well in my adult life, such as how to work hard at a job, and how to manage my time and how to be self-sufficient. I don't think I would have absorbed those messages the same from my father. Seeing a female role model working makes a big difference. Although I sometimes wished my mom was a bit more "June Cleaver", I have way too many friends who had housewife moms that were bitter and angry and treated them badly behind the nice facade. Often it was because they were stuck in bad marriages with no financial way out because the had abandoned their careers for kids.

 

I don't think one is better than the other, or that one is more revered than the other in the long run, but they are revered for different things. A stay-at-home mom is automatically assumed to be more "nurturing" even if she is actually a crappy mom. And a working woman is assumed to be more "ambitious", even if she sucks at her job. Both are important roles, but they are not the same things.

inori 65 pts

@Sunshine789 @Neecy ,i totally agree with you sometimes mother's have a self flagelating need to be needed .a lot of times the kids do not need or want all the extra attention ,it so that they feel their lives have meanings. Even as a child i did not want June cleaver i actually wished my mother was more ambitious .

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Neecy "It seems some women do enjoy more recognition for making it in demanding careers but also want to get revered for being mothers too."

 

I haven't seen that. But I have seen plenty of women who stay home with their kids and taking care of their households speak as if they are running multi-million dollar organizations. And on one hand I can see why these women do--everyone wants to think that what they doing with their lives is important and valuable. On the other hand, it sounds like overcompensation to compare the job housemanager with being a CEO. 

Blackberry 1177 pts

Just wanted to add this old scene from the west wing. It may or may not be your show, but the scene is relevant. During President Bartlet's second presidential campaign the first lady (stockard channing) is asked about how she is coping with the temporary loss of her license to practice medicine. She reponds "At this moment I am just a wife and mother." There is outrage and woman begin to protest at campaign rallies while wearing aprons and holding rolling pins. The couple talks about the fallout: (its only a 2minutes long) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cleny0mDdSo

tracyreneejones 3548 pts

GIRL....*gasps* The audacity of her....(That's a poem title) 

 

Loved this and Hell yeah, he's 50% donor to the little DNA creature and he's better with the kids then..WTF? If I'm on the fast track at work and skating past ninja's for a fat paycheck my entire family benefits. Sheet....I had to be in two places at once to single mother my teen daughter and work and attend college full time, but this piece of paper also paid for therapy and a better neighborhood which we both needed prior to me spreading myself paper thin. 

Any economics study will tell you, when women are allowed to raise up economically, everyone benefits. That's not just good for their families, that's good for all families. The same goes for educating girls. 

Blackberry 1177 pts

2) ambition. My below post was more about middle & lower class motherhood. This is about the upper-middle and upwardly mobile. In a lot of circle the word ambition (when applied to a woman) is code for cold-vicious-b*tch" . It's all very Lady MacBeth. "watch out for her...she'll stab in the face and in the back" or worse "sleep her way to top. You'll just be a notch on her CEO bedpost!" Of course with that archtype of course it is inconceivable that such a mom could have the capacity to be a caring mother. Inherent in this is a sense that women can only want one thing at a time, or are only capable to handling one thing at a time. It boggles their minds that an ambitiuos and goal oriented woman could have many goals with one of them being a family. Conversely, this logical undermines stay-at-home mothers. Just because I woman stays at home and finds fulfillment as a fulltime mother doesn't mean she doesn't want anything else for herself. Guess what: women are complex creatures.

uninterracial 948 pts

Stay at home/Work at home mother of two chiming in:

Before I had my first son, I had a very good, well-paying job. My intent was to go back to work after 6 months, but I couldn’t stand the thought of leaving him in a day-care center when I knew we didn’t have to. Fast forward 5 years later and I now have two sons and I work from home. At times, I resented my husband because after all he got to have coffee breaks and have intelligent conversations with adults during the day. I was very frustrated at times, but my husband was very loving and supportive and thankful to me that I sacrificed my career so our kids could have the best care. Had I not stayed home with my 1st son, his speech delay may have gone unnoticed or just brushed aside because he is a boy. I was able to take him to his speech therapy and not have to worry about taking time off of work. I mean, there are advantages.

The notion that women who work don’t love their kids is something I don’t agree with at all. My mom worked, and I believe she worked because of us, and for us, not in spite; but she also loved her job. Most mothers do. No doubts your “hearts” can hire the best nannies in the world, but most moms do the best they can to make sure their children are cared for properly. My mom certainly tried but my babysitters were horrible. I don’t think she didn’t love me and I’m sure she didn’t know all of their faults.

It was my choice to be a hands-on mom. This might not be for everyone, and at times, I see why. Some of things I deal with, I swear, I think I must have been high or something when I decided this. But if I was diagnosed with some horrible disease that was rendered incurable or terminal, I would not be lamenting on how much I was missing out on work.  The time spent with my kids would be the foremost thought in my mind. A cubicle or corner office could never give you the same satisfaction as your child, the one you nurtured in your body for 10 months, saying I love You, Mommy.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 uninterracial "A cubicle or corner office could never give you the same satisfaction as your child,..."

 

Why not? Why is it impossible to think that a woman could receive more pleasure from her career than from taking care of her kids?

 

A woman nurtures a baby in her body for months..but it takes years of eduction and experience to be considered qualified to do certain jobs. Getting pregnant and having a baby is easy in comparison. This is not to say that having a career should be more enjoyable than having a baby, but I am saying that not all women are so romantic and/or refuse to idealize the caregiving role. 

uninterracial 948 pts

 Jamila Getting pregnant and having a baby is not easy for some. Some women die from it. Apples and oranges if you ask me.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 uninterracial Some people die from their careers. Ask coal miners. 

uninterracial 948 pts

Tit-for-tat today, I see.

 

Well, people shouldn’t become coal miners; just like some people should really consider whether or not they really want to have children.

 

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 uninterracial "Well, people shouldn’t become coal miners..."

 

It's a dirty job, but SOMEBODY has to do it...

uninterracial 948 pts

 Jamila Okay, whatever. No sense going back and forth about it.

inori 65 pts

@Jamila @uninterracial bless you jamila the idea that having children will always make you happy is a lie,and the fact that getting pregnant or having children is difficult for a few women makes it somehow magical for everyone is false advertising to say the least.

uninterracial 948 pts

 inori  Jamila  uninterracial Huh? Was that slam towards my comment? If it is, bless your heart.

Sunshine789 711 pts

 Jamila  uninterracial Agreed! I might want kids someday, and I am sure I will get satisfaction from it, but it will not be a replacement for my career by a long shot. I find spending more than a few hours with a young child to be mind-numbing, personally. I have considered adopting an older kid just to skip that baby-phase, lol! Somewhat joking....

uninterracial 948 pts

 Sunshine789  Jamila When I was in my 20's, I had the exact same mindset. I didn't want to deal with the birth and baby phase, but if your HUSBAND (that word had barely been mentioned, only the Working Home Keeper referenced hers thus far) wants his own children you are pretty much out of luck.

 

Let's not forget about the men in this also. The first woman said her 1st husband stepped out on her (hmmm, wonder why?) and she went out and "got" a second husband. I don't know many women who have the ability to just get a husband to fit into whatever they want their life to be, but god bless her. I predict that this Mayer woman and her hubby are divorced within 5 years. He is handsome VC and she is a workaholic, and now they have a baby- recipe for disaster. Kids can be a heavy burden on any relationship, and when money isn't an issue, something else most definitely will be. But that's when porn and hookers come in I guess.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

uninterracialSunshine789

So, first you say this: "People are individual, so are their decisions. There is no one size fit all solution to this."

 

Then you show your true colors by saying this: " I predict that this Mayer woman and her hubby are divorced within 5 years. "

 

Which one is it: Is every woman different and capable of discerning her own needs, or is it just career women who can't maintain a marriage?

 

[This post has been edited to be less snarky.]

 

uninterracial 948 pts

Jamila

“Which one is it: Is every woman different and capable of discerning her own needs, or is it just career women who can't maintain a marriage?”

 

Look, this is my last response regarding this subject because I’m getting irritated . I really don’t like you at all so let this just be it and let us go our separate ways.

 

This was just my personal opinion since I live relatively close to the bay area and this topic was actually covered right after she gave birth. Some other thing were discussed about their relationship and that’s all there is to it; it ain’t that deep. Career women are certainly capable of maintaining a marriage if you find the right balance. I don’t see how a workaholic can do it. It’s just not going to work IMO.

 

Now, I’m unfollowing  this conversation. I don’t need a young, childless, and I guess jobless woman (since you are too broke to get dates or whatever) coming at me over and over again with this dribble; damn, do what you want to do. If you want to stay home and raise kids, FINE; if you want to parent by proxy, FINE TOO. But I’m done.

Statuesque 1747 pts

 uninterracial "A cubicle or corner office could never give you the same satisfaction as your child"

 

I should hope not!  I would also say that there is no attempt to compare the satisfaction gained from being a mother and from working when is doing both.  To even try to compare the two is what leads to all of the angst and drama around it.

 

Raising a child and nurturing a career are different activities and probably highlight different aspects of who an individual woman believes she is.  You didn't say this, but I think the problem is that women are made to feel like if they love one and dedicate themselves to being good at one, they are neglecting the other by default.

uninterracial 948 pts

 Statuesque"You didn't say this, but I think the problem is that women are made to feel like if they love one and dedicate themselves to being good at one, they are neglecting the other by default."

 

You bet I didn't, I would never say such a thing. People are individual, so are their decisions. There is no one size fit all solution to this. I say do what's best for you and your family.

Blackberry 1177 pts

"When it comes to women, people equate sacrifice with love. Why are we still fighting the antiquated notion that a woman who has little-to-no desire to be a stay-at-home mom must not love her kids?" THIS! Thank you for writing this piece. Aside from the whole gender divide when it comes to parenting I totally reject the notion that their is only one way to be a good mom (or wife). It is also highly illogical for some to have this belief - depending on social class. I will be a working mother/wife because I'm ambitious. (I'll get back go that word in a minute). But a lot of american children grow up in a home where both parents work because the family needs both incomes to survive! Are these moms good moms for providing for their families or bad moms because they leave the home everyday. Both my parents worked (school teacher/military) and they were great parents. I hate this same fight with my sister in law, who is barely middle class, four kids. They rent and don't own and she wanted to take off work to be a fulltime mom for her school age kids! I'm like girl, provide a home first, figure out who stays in it second!

tracyreneejones 3548 pts

 Blackberry I'm like girl, provide a home first, figure out who stays in it second!

 

You shoulda *dropped the mic* with that line...lol..

inori 65 pts

Thank you! i am sick and tired of the idea that women were put on earth to suffer . i have a brain that i want to use staying at home is my idea of hell, for some women it works for me not at all. Why do men have the benefit of living out their dreams and having a family .One of the reasons i want a good paying job is so i can out source the parts of life i do not like i.e cooking ,housekeeping and laundry.  Which is why the post on " the war on men" upset me, when women can have a career and family without being murdered by public opinion then we can talk about if there is a war on men

Blackberry 1177 pts

@inori War on Men: Co-sign. Totally, but I will add this. If your (the male collective) masculinity is so fragile that growth on my part (the female collective) would, by default, undermine your manhood......well...then you probably weren't that strong in your indentity in the first place. Maybe you need to work on the war within before you go claiming that my self actualization is somehow about you! *sorry, but that whole war on men drives my blood pressure up*

Sunshine789 711 pts

 inori Amen! I will not feel guilty for outsourcing cooking and housekeeping (if I can afford to) until society changes enough for men to willingly step up to the plate and decide that staying at home could be enjoyable for them as well. There is a reason men haven't used their power over the years to force women into the workplace so that they can stay at home - lol!

Statuesque 1747 pts

While I am not sure that I would forgo a more reasonable maternity leave personally, I understand exactly why Mayer made her choice.  Achieving success in the corporate world still requires the sacrifice of family and leisure time for both men and women.  It's just that when women who are or will be mothers do it, there is nothing but criticism from all sides.  What matters is the support structure in place for her, her husband and the kids.

 

There is nothing wrong with stay-at-home motherhood, and there is nothing wrong with work-outside-of-the home motherhood.  What I can't stand is when either is held up as the feminine ideal, or when women in either camp get smug and think that their lifestyle choices represent the moral high ground for all of womankind.  That's BS, and women don't need any more guilt trips when most of us wear ourselves out trying to be all things to all people.  The individual needs of parents, children and families will not be served by one model.

 

Let's also remember that the Mayer/Kracheck model only works when one possesses elite and highly valued business skills, or when one is generating significant revenue through one's talents. Women who go to work every day as nurses, soldiers, nannies and store managers, and they don't have the luxury of hiring staff to outsource the tasks of parenting and household management, single or married. 

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Statuesque Re: soldiers

 

If a woman is off at war then she has totally outsourced household management and most parenting, just like men have to do when they go off to war. 

Statuesque 1747 pts

 Jamila Actually, that assumption underestimates the dire situation that many soldiers,  male and female, have had to work out in wartime deployment and multiple tours of combat-related duty.  "Outsourcing" in those instances is not about hiring a nanny or personal assistant, but about relying on family (if possible) to resolve it, and often quickly.  My point was not about the military per se, but about the financial aspect of outsourcing that is glossed over.  It is a privileged position to outsource these tasks, not a foregone conclusion or easy choice for folks who can't afford or aren't in a position to easily shift those tasks to someone else.  So in that instance when the financial or familial means may not be easy to come by, the choice is not quite the same.  That was my point.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Statuesque Whether it's outsourced to family members or outsourced to a nanny/chef/maid,it's still being outsourced. 

 

"It is a privileged position to outsource these tasks, not a foregone conclusion or easy choice for folks who can't afford or aren't in a position to easily shift those tasks to someone else."

 

I don't think the military is a good example. After all, when men and women join the military they have to understand that deployment is a real possibility and I know that they are encouraged to plan for that possibility. You can't join the military and not understand that if you are deployed someone else will have to look after your kids. And if you are uncomfortable with someone else looking after your kids (or you don't have someone lined-up who agrees to look after your kids in the case of a deployment), then you don't join the military. 

 

Joining the military is a much of a choice as having a high-powered career. 

Statuesque 1747 pts

 Jamila Yes, and every person who "chooses" or has to work to support themselves is also responsible.  Again, my point is not about whether some people with professions are less entitled to sympathy or that some people do not have to take responsibility for their choices, only that there are not easy choices for many mothers, especially financially, and finances matter here.  The moniker "outsourcing" describes nothing if not a financial arrangement between two parties.

 

Even mothers who appear to have it made financially make difficult choices every day in order to be the best parents they can be.  I don't believe in the holier-than-thou approach to motherhood.

Jamila 7215 pts moderator

 Statuesque "The moniker "outsourcing" describes nothing if not a financial arrangement between two parties."

 

Oh, I'm sure that military parents who leave their children to be taken care of by family have also made financial arrangements with the caregivers.

 

Doing something out of the kindness of your heart (taking care of your grandkids when the parents aren't around) doesn't preclude one from asking to receive financial remuneration of some kind, even if it's just money that will be used to take care of the kids.

 

I don't know any military parents who left their kids with family and didn't also set up some kind of allotment for their kids' caregivers. 

tracyreneejones 3548 pts

 Jamila  Statuesque I didn't join the military because I kept asking about my daughter's accommodations. When I was told I had to sign her over to someone else...no dice. Was it right or wrong? I don't know, but it felt right. 

We all have decisions to make and must accommodate the people we bring into it. Survival is not one size fits all. 

Statuesque 1747 pts

 Jamila Lol but that's not the point either...though it would be an interesting topic of discussion (what caregivers feel like when they are "outsourced" to).  When women in the military are mothers, they have tough choices to make.  Wartime deployment places special burdens on military families. The situation now is also somewhat unprecedented in that the consequences of these wars are different in that regard, and the military has had to contend with issues it was not necessarily prepared to deal with.  I know personally many female soldiers who did what they had to do, without the support I believe they should have had, and that's where my perspective comes from, and that is another example of what women who are working mothers have to balance and figure out.